EnvironmentLeave a Comment on AXEL HONNETH REIFICACIN PDF


Axel Honneth will study the long-run social consequences of the ongoing dissolution of the integrative force of contract-based work. His project will be partly. In Freedom’s Right: The Social Foundations of Democratic Life (), Axel Honneth, Professor of Philosophy at the University of Frankfurt and at Columbia. Axel Honneth: Against Sloterdijk (Die Zeit, 24 September, ) An English translation of Peter Sloterdijk’s.

Author: Dagal Zulkiktilar
Country: Solomon Islands
Language: English (Spanish)
Genre: Travel
Published (Last): 6 December 2014
Pages: 229
PDF File Size: 13.91 Mb
ePub File Size: 12.85 Mb
ISBN: 738-2-14033-440-8
Downloads: 2610
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]
Uploader: Fenribei

It was that equating an intra-national moral code structured around the values of national honour and solidarity with the moral universalism of internationalism is to overlook the very different intentions behind their respective calls for equality. His first main work The Critique of Power: By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.

Axel Honneth Against Sloterdijk

Luta Por Reconhecimento Documents. The political slogan for this programme?

To that extent the history of civilisation, as this bald repetition of Nietzsche has it, consists in nothing more than an ever-constant confrontation between life-affirming and life-denying groups, between associations of human beings who enjoy life proudly and those who honneh to spoil the latters vitality. First, every society is governed by a set of moral principles that holds it together. Reconocimiento y Reificacin, Axel Honneth Documents.

Things are not improved by the fact that that product reifcacin re-appears in times of sharper social conflict and it doesnt become any more credible either when compliant intellectuals like Sloterdijk give it their intellectual blessing.

Autonomia y Reconocimiento en Axel Honneth Documents. Again, the skeptic will see little reason to grant Honneth his starting point, yet without it everything that comes afterwards will remain unconvincing. But for Hegel the moral principles governing his society still represented a definite advance over the past, as reason marches ever onward towards its fulfilment.

Axel Honneth Against Sloterdijk

For example, Honneth assumes, without argument, that there are moral principles underlying modern Western society that are simply waiting to be found. From this point, its not far to the claim that the world-historical catastrophes of the twentieth century were initiated by the revolts of two associations of the aggrieved, with intellectuals playing the part of the new ministers of world-spiritual hatred, their knowledge enabling them to use the slogans of a moralistic humanism and organise the product of humiliation and disdain, the spleen of the masses, against the elites.


In plain English, what thats meant to mean is that every legal duty to hand over part of their own wealth in the form of tax only does injury to their proprietorial sense of well-earned success, while an act of self-imposed over-taxation whose bounty falls to the lower orders would spark a feeling of joyous benevolence.

Did the world really need Philosophy of Right 2.

Honneth’s critical adaptation of these is the basis of his critical social theory, which attempts to remedy the deficits of previous approaches. Retrieved from ” https: You really have to take a close look several times at the implicit argument before it dawns on you what the peculiar thesis is that Sloterdijk is putting forward with such nonchalance here: His recent work Reification reformulates this key ” Western Marxist ” concept in terms of intersubjective relations of recognition and power.

Axel Honneth

Moreover, history itself did not demonstrate a smooth process of advancement. Now he was free to cast a sort gonneth intuitive glance into the essence of existence. But the burning question about the social antagonism of our own times was something he had yet to turn his attention to.

Nevertheless, Hegel and his followers believed that there were clear moral principles governing the then modern world.

Freedom’s Right by Axel Honneth | Issue | Philosophy Now

However, doing so means contravening the norms of intellectual honesty, if in the process the old is passed off as the new just so you can save yourself a discussion of counterarguments raised long ago.

Wikimedia Commons has media related to Axel Honneth. It also comes to mind that he is the moderator of a philosophical round-table on German tv.


Hegel was aware of these problems. EssenWest Germany. Surely its rare for products of the intellectual past that in their own time betrayed little more than defensiveness and dull fears to be freshened up so deftly and presented as the reicicacin word on the spiritual and political condition of the contemporary world.

With the courage of a true free thinker, he hlnneth essays the means with which the historical victors, the wealthy, could put an end to the cruel game that brings all their successes into ever greater disrepute.

In the Philosophy of RightHegel sought to identify the moral principles that he believed could be found underlying his contemporary society, and which represented a particular stage in the world-historical development of reason.

Readers may have always suspected that his own resentment was at the bottom of that Nietzschean critique of ressentiment he has successfully mimicked.

Hed heard enough complaints about growing unemployment, hed had enough too of joyless preoccupation with the life at the bottom of the heap: But was it worth updating Hegel in the first place?

For Sloterdijk, merely repairing the existing social order is not good enough, when something as great as the misery qxel the ruling classes is at stake.

Axel Honneth – Honenth. The majority of Germans seemed too dependent; the culture was too attached to the open hand of the state for it possibly to give birth to any sort of powerful idea or way of life.

The value systems of nationalism and internationalism thus do not represent two sides of one and the same humanist ideal of equality, as Sloterdijk, like Gehlen, would have us believe. No thirst for power, no envy and no resentment is needed to explain why.