Foreword by Daniel Dennett. List of Contributors. Acknowledgements. 1. Introduction – Robert Aunger. 2. The memes’ eye view – Susan Blackmore. 3. Taking. Darwinizing Culture has 33 ratings and 6 reviews. Hakan said: Kitabı Alfa Yayınlarının Kültürün Darwincileşmesi: Memetik Biliminin Değerlendirmesi çevi. By applying biological theories and tools to cultural phenomena (e.g., cultural diversity, cultural revolutions), cultural evolutionists purport to make the study of.
|Published (Last):||22 April 2012|
|PDF File Size:||6.48 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||10.89 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
Oxford University Press is a department of the University of Oxford. My opinion is that this perspective misses the real power of memetics.
Darwinizing Culture – Robert Aunger – Oxford University Press
The one thing noticeably missing has been any kind of proper debate over the validity of a concept regarded by many darwinizign scientifically suspect. Robert Boyd, and Peter J. Chapter 8 An objection to the memetic approach to culture Dan Sperber. Matthias rated it liked it Sep 24, Chapter 5 Memes through social minds Rosaria Conte.
Just like the biological organisms, cultural objects artefacts, theories, institutions, etc. First of all, I have trouble understanding why nearly all the arguments in the book revolve around human social behaviour and how hard it is for memetics to account for it.
Darwinizing culture: The status of cultural evolutionary theory as a science
This book is available as part of Oxford Scholarship Online – view abstracts and keywords at book and chapter level. These concepts may be straw men created by the early proponents of memetics like Richard Dawkins in The Selfish Geneand no wonder they are easily burned down by critics speaking in sarcastic tones.
In this perspective, the general relativity theory is a memetic construct, resulting from the interactions of maybe thousands of memes that we may not readily map one-to-one onto the properties that we perceive and talk about on a semantic level. Want to Read saving…. Don’t have an account? Culture and psychological mechanisms, Henry Plotkin 5. This simplistic language, still adopted by some memeticists today, is turned against the memetic theory to condemn it as an oversimplification too funny to be true.
Of course, the issue of what Aunger calls Mental Darwinism becomes important here: A Very Short Introduction J. Only Maurice Bloch rises some interesting questions. Refresh and try again.
John rated it it was ok Feb 16, As Dennett reminds us on various occasions and topics, we must be prepared to, if not expect to, discover that accurate scientific theories culrure often counter-intuitive. If memes are the answer, what is the question? The one thing noticeably missing has been any kind of proper debate over the validity of a concept regarded by many as scientifically suspect.
With a forward by Daniel Dennett, and contributions form Dan Sperber, David Hll, Robert Boyd, Susan Blackmore, Henry Plotkin, and others, the result is a thrilling and challenging debate that will perhaps mark a turning point for the field, and for future research. Subscriber Login Email Address. Goodreads helps you keep track of books you want to read.
I propose that two things should encourage us to operate under the assumption that Blackmore is right, and embark on the project of analyzing cultural designs within the memetic framework: Why yes, I darwlnizing consider myself a memeticist, ever since I was introduced to it via Dawkins-Dennett-Blackmore.
Foreword, Daniel Dennett List of contributors Acknowledgements 1. Stefano rated it it was ok May 05, Laland, and John Odling-Smee.
Tyler Brown Cifu Shuster rated it really liked it Nov 14, An objection to the memetic approach to culture, Dan Sperber 9. Want to Read Currently Reading Darwiniing. Conclusion, Robert Aunger Index.
Publications Pages Publications Pages. I reviewed darwjnizing one in the Quarterly Review of Biology. Print Save Cite Email Share. It seems to me that the reactions of psychologists and anthropologists against memetics are based on a misunderstanding that memetics is here to sweep their theories on human nature away and start from scratch. Rich Boulton rated it really liked it Apr 07, With a forward by Daniel Dennett, and contributions form Dan Sperber, David Hll, Robert Boyd, Susan Blackmore, Henry Plotkin, and others, the result is a thrilling and challenging debate that will perhaps mark a turning point for the field, and for future research.
Simply Rational Gerd Gigerenzer. Universal acid or a better mousetrap? Choose your country or region Close. This is the second point that disturbs me in the discussions in general: Khash Sajadi rated it it was ok Sep 12,