Abstract Many oil and gas facilities utilize fixed gas detection systems as a safeguard against uncontrolled release of hazardous process materials. Buy ISA TR GUIDANCE ON THE EVALUATION OF FIRE AND GAS SYSTEM EFFECTIVENESS from SAI Global. hi freinds, does anyone have an idea about FGS Safety Lifecycle ”ISA-TR Technical Report”?, i need an example of project.
|Published (Last):||4 May 2014|
|PDF File Size:||2.66 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||19.50 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
The fully enclosed module handles flammable hydrocarbon liquids and gases under high pressure. The likelihood of the mitigated hazard e. The goal is to determine the fraction of geometric area within a monitored process area that is covered if a release were to tr84.00.077 in a given geographic location.
Other scenarios not analyzed in this example include a large leak and a rupture of equipment.
The third aspect is the mitigation effectiveness, which has a significant impact on the event outcome and should be carefully considered when evaluating FGS effectiveness. FGS ineffectiveness is also related to the inability of the mitigation elements e. From a practical standpoint, the size and shape of a gas release that requires detection are required to perform a basis analysis of gas-detector coverage.
Kaufman Honeywell International Inc K. Consequently, many FGS functions are identified through studies focusing on fire protection and control of hazardous environments rather than process hazards analysis.
The focus of this report is to provide recommended practices for the design of fire and gas detection systems.
InTech Magazine Web Exclusive: Coppler Ametek, Inc E. Use of this methodology in a real process application has shown that this high detector coverage may not be achieved cost effectively.
The application of the risk model shows the calculation of the weighted average consequence for the modified array. Dispersion modeling of a toxic cloud and a flammable cloud is similar. For FGS functions, detector coverage should be analyzed with the same quantitative rigor as the verification of the average probability of failure on demand for the hardware design. Computational requirements are high for tr840.0.07 method as well as scenario coverage.
ISA-TR Guidance on the Evaluation of Fire and Gas System Effectiveness
LOPA is an established method for evaluating hazardous event propagation and assessing the capability of safety functions in reducing event risk. This arrangement tends to provide a higher level of safety in that a dangerous undetected failure of a single detector will not inhibit the required safety action once the hazard is detected by any second non-failed detector.
Since an analysis of geographic coverage is not conducted on a scenario-by-scenario basis, a general criterion needs to be established to determine the size of gas release that requires detection anywhere within a monitored area. Ando Yokogawa Electric Co R.
ISA TR84.00.07 2010 ED
This escalated hazard may or may not be detectable by other detectors in the FGS; and if detectable, the FGS may or may not be effective in mitigating the larger hazard. If 1ooN voting is proposed, flag the location as covered only if it is within the field of view of one or more fire detectors in the monitored area. Proceedings of an international conference Diverless and Deepwater Techology: The concepts underlying a performance-based approach are suitable to the analysis and design of FGS, and these principles can be used effectively in conjunction with other good engineering practices.
If the risk criteria indicate that the unmitigated risk scenario is tolerable, there is no need for additional risk reduction unless otherwise mandated by local legal requirements. This is not intended to indicate that toxic gas detection should be excluded from the application of performance-based design, but rather that the unique issues and factors associated with toxic gas detection are not addressed in this technical report.
Wellbay ModuleWellhead Figure A. Create a sum total of all covered locations and determine the overall fraction of a geographic area that is covered in the monitored area i. For simplification of this analysis for illustrative purposes, the analysis of only one risk scenario is included here. For simplification of this analysis and for illustrative purposes, the analysis of only one risk scenario is included here.
For flammable gas detection, factors such as the degree of confinement and presence of turbulence-inducing obstacles require consideration. To be of real value, this document should not be static but should be subject to periodic review. Spurious activation of the suppression system is not hazardous, but it is an undesired event from an economic standpoint.
The screening analysis should proceed by considering each potential leak source, as well as occupied areas, ignition sources, and high-value assets.
The failure of this equipment, its controls, or the piping system itself leaks, erosion, and corrosioncan lead to a potential release. In either case, the analytical method to determine coverage could range from simple lookup tables to rigorous computer modeling of physical phenomena. For the sake of simplicity, it is assumed that a hazardous event that is not detected due to inadequate detector coverage results in an unmitigated hazard that is beyond the capability of the FGS to effectively mitigate.
Add one or more additional gas detectors to increase detector coverage Increase the frequency of functional tests of the existing system design to increase FGS safety availability Note, in this particular example, simply increasing the functional test frequency by itself will not result in an acceptable design. A range of possible scenario outcomes addressed the possibility that the gas cloud would disperse downwind from the release location and could be oriented in either the favorable wind direction or the non-favorable wind direction.
Under these circumstances, the FGS design is based on simple prescriptive practices e.
The effectiveness of fixed gas detection systems is most often limited by the ability of the system to detect that a release has occurred. Orphaned articles from August All orphaned articles. In this case, only 8 percent of the time the platform is occupied.
Geographic tr84.0.07 is only concerned with the location and performance attributes of detection equipment and obstructions to the “view” of the equipment. An example is an uncontrolled release of a flammable gas in gas production wells due to produced sand causing erosive damage to flowlines.